|
Difference between
version 3
and
version 1:
| At line 1 added 19 lines. |
| + |
| + !Summary |
| + *Use a pre-existing constrained vocabulary to classify assessment items based on their content |
| + |
| + !Preconditions |
| + *There exists an appropriate vocabulary (NBII thesaurus) |
| + *Assessment and assessment items have been entered into the system |
| + *User has appropriate access rights to edit the metadata |
| + |
| + !Basic Course of Events |
| + #User selects the assessment item to classify (web vs. desktop app still TBD) |
| + #User selects the vocabulary they would like to use ("NBII thesaurus") |
| + #User selects the appropriate term from that vocabulary |
| + ##User would possibly interact with an additional UI to help locate an appropriate term. |
| + ##User will select narrowest applicable term such that detail is not lost ("natual selection" vs. "evolution") |
| + |
| + !Notes |
| + *This use case assumes content classification is being performed by the author/owner of the assessment item (user who uploaded it initially). |
| + *There should be another use case [here|UsecaseTaggingAssessmentItems] that details how other users can tag assessment items such that they are not editing the original. |
Back to Usecase Classify Assessment Items,
or to the Page History.
|
