|
Difference between
version 3
and
version 1:
| Line 2 was replaced by lines 2-3 |
| - *Assessment items submitted to the database should be tagged with |
| + *Assessment items submitted to the database should be tagged with discipline-specific concepts, as defined by the database. For biology, we have chosen to use the NBII Biocomplexity Thesaurus. Ontologies from other disciplines are pending. |
| + *Additions or changes to a discipline-specific ontology will be reflected in subsequent versions of the ontology/database. In other words, the ontology is generally not dynamic. |
| At line 4 added 1 line. |
| + *An ontology for a particular discipline has been chosen and incorporated into the database. |
| At line 6 added 7 lines. |
| + *Faculty member will upload an assessment. |
| + *Following parsing of the assessment, the faculty member will be prompted to indicate concepts associated with each assessment item. A pull-down menu might be appropriate (but it could be overly large). |
| + |
| + *Faculty member has an assessment item on a new topic in biology. |
| + *The current ontology does not provide an appropriate topic or concept for this assessment item. |
| + *Faculty member submits a suggested addition to the ontology to the database administration team. |
| + *The database administration team incorporates the suggestion into future versions of the ontology. |
Back to Use Case 4,
or to the Page History.
|
